Victor Lilov vs Lucca Pinto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve performance in the past six months, Lilov edges out Pinto slightly, winning 43.14% of second serve points compared to Pinto's 42.93%. Does this give Lilov a slight advantage in service games? It appears so.
• In return games, Pinto has been more successful, capturing 49.72% of points on the opponent's second serve, while Lilov has won 48.15% in similar circumstances. This gives Pinto a marginal advantage in return games.
• Lilov performs better on first serve returns, winning 30.03% of those points, surpassing Pinto's 26.62%. Could this be critical in pivotal match moments? Likely yes.
• Pinto shows a stronger ability to handle pressure by saving 54.68% of breakpoints, compared to Lilov's 49.77%. This might be crucial in clutch situations.
• On an overall scale, over the past year, Lilov has a marginally better win rate of 56.1%, whereas Pinto stands at 47.37%. Lilov's consistent performance may provide an edge.
• Surface preferences show that Lilov excels on clay with a win rate of 55%, whereas Pinto favors hard courts with a 47% win rate. Could the match surface influence the outcome? Absolutely.
• In lower-tier tournaments, Lilov seems more formidable, winning 60.53% of matches, while Pinto has secured 49.09% of wins. Lilov's experience and success at these levels might be pivotal.
• Pinto has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 191.11 compared to Lilov's 382.49. Does this indicate a better readiness for high-stakes matches? It may well suggest that.
• Deciding set prowess appears to favor Lilov, who has triumphed in 67% of such situations, compared to Pinto's 40% win rate. If this match extends to three sets, Lilov seems to have the upper hand.
• Break point conversion rates are nearly identical, with Lilov at 33.77% and Pinto at 33.33%. This indicates that neither player holds a significant advantage in breakpoint scenarios.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Lilov and Pinto promises to be intriguing, with both players showcasing distinct strengths and playing styles. Lilov's marginally better performance on the second serve and his stronger win record over the past year could prove decisive.

Pinto, on the other hand, demonstrates stronger return game statistics and has played against higher-ranked opponents, indicating a readiness for competitive matches.

The surface may also play a crucial role, especially since Lilov seems to perform well on clay, which may be advantageous if the match takes place on that surface.

When analyzing breakpoint and deciding set statistics, Lilov stands out with a higher deciding set victory rate. This resilience in final sets gives him an edge if the match goes the distance.

Taking these factors into account, Lilov seems to have a slight advantage and is the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.